Re: Patch: Query favourites

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Query favourites
Date: 2006-01-30 14:06:46
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103DC87@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> Magnus Hagander
> Sent: 29 January 2006 20:56
> To: Andreas Pflug
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Patch: Query favourites
>
> On this we clearly disagree (on the value of the feature,
> that is). But
> that's your choice, of course. I'll keep running with it myself until
> such a time as an alternative exists.
> Let's, as they say, agree to disagree on it.

FWIW, I do think this would be a nice feature, and would tie in nicely
with an idea I've been mulling over of having a centralised library site
for SQL snippets.

However, I did just download wxxml2 to give it a go and instantly ran
into problems building it on Windows. I'm sure I could get over them
with a little effort, but a little effort for me to build probably means
a lot more effort helping others in the future :-(

How much work would it be to use libxml2/msxml - assuming you are
*definitely* going to be working on some XML import/export features that
we agree would be accepted in principle?

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message svn 2006-01-30 14:07:25 SVN Commit by andreas: r4979 - trunk/pgadmin3/src/ctl
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2006-01-30 14:06:39 Re: Query tool: Autocompletion