Re: Disallow premature is broken

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Ludek Finstrle" <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Disallow premature is broken
Date: 2006-01-27 10:03:26
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103DB99@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ludek Finstrle [mailto:luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz]
> Sent: 27 January 2006 09:52
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Ludek Finstrle; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org; Tom Lane
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Disallow premature is broken
>
> > > What do you think? How do we want change the behaviout before
> > > releasing new stable release? I'm not sure. There is no much time
> > > for testing new behaviour. The multistatements hasn't
> been reported
> > > yet by users. It seems this feature isn't widely used.
> >
> > In the short term though, I say just stop it crashing and
> let's get a
> > release out seeing as Tom is getting antsy about FC5 :-)
>
> Ok. I agree. (what is the word "antsy" I can't find it in vocabulary).

Nervous that it might not arrive in time.

> > Can you produce a final 08.01.0108 dev build, and I'll look to build
> > 08.01.0200 on say Tuesday/Wednesday? Does that work for you Tom?
>
> I'll try to create the patch for Disallow Premature today. But I'm not
> sure if I will have enough time for it. I have few time today
> and during
> weekend :-(

:-( Me too.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adnan DURSUN 2006-01-27 10:24:59 unsubscribe
Previous Message Ludek Finstrle 2006-01-27 09:57:44 Re: network saturation