Re: No function matches the given name and argument types.

From: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: arons <arons7(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No function matches the given name and argument types.
Date: 2023-01-16 17:57:56
Message-ID: E748FF9F-9358-4100-95B8-30804DA676B2@thebuild.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Jan 16, 2023, at 09:53, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I don't see any good way to say: "given this function signature, and the fact it cannot be found, what are the next closest function signatures that are present".

I can see a use-case for such functionality, though: A "did you mean?" error message.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Torsten Förtsch 2023-01-16 18:59:33 minor bug
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2023-01-16 17:53:04 Re: No function matches the given name and argument types.