Re: [Patch] Mention md5 is deprecated in postgresql.conf.sample

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Mention md5 is deprecated in postgresql.conf.sample
Date: 2025-11-14 11:53:41
Message-ID: E6E0577D-7143-46AE-8A47-90762BDE0CC2@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 14 Nov 2025, at 11:47, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> while looking through postgresql.conf on PG18, I noticed that
> password_encryption mentions md5 as valid alternative to scram-sha-256.
> I think it would be useful to mention md5 is deprecated so that people
> looking at it (but have otherwise not gotten the memo) will realize and
> hopefully act on it.

No objection. I suspect the overlap between users who don't read release notes
and users who read .conf.sample comments closely is pretty small, but it
certainly won't hurt.

-#password_encryption = scram-sha-256 # scram-sha-256 or md5
+#password_encryption = scram-sha-256 # scram-sha-256 or (deprecated) md5
#scram_iterations = 4096
#md5_password_warnings = on

Maybe this should be combined with a comment on md5_password_warnings as well?

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-11-14 12:11:15 Re: BUG #19095: Test if function exit() is used fail when linked static
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-11-14 11:53:21 Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart