Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Date: 2009-09-08 16:27:06
Message-ID: E6DB1517-22A9-4163-B15E-3AD778673D55@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sep 8, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> If you don't want any constraints at all on the argument types, you
> can use "any" (with the quotes, because it's a reserved word :-().
> If you want some constraints but not "anyelement", please be more
> specific about what you want.

Oooh, I need to try that. How far back does that behavior go,
compatibility-wise?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-09-08 16:32:50 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-09-08 16:26:20 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types