Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
Date: 2006-09-03 11:51:46
Message-ID: E68A4F55-F3D8-407A-91E8-832F9835AC30@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


On Sep 3, 2006, at 12:34 , Bruce Momjian wrote:

> OK, I worked with Michael and I think this is the best we are going to
> do to fix this. It has one TSROUND call for Powerpc, and that is
> documented. Applied.

As I was working up regression tests, I found a case that this patch
doesn't handle.

select interval '4 mon' * .3 as product_h;
product_h
-----------------------
1 mon 5 days 24:00:00
(1 row)

This should be 1 mon 6 days. It fails for any number of months
greater than 3 that is not evenly divisible by 10, greater than 3
months. Do we need to look at the month remainder separately?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 13:37:41 Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change FETCH/MOVE
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2006-09-03 11:02:30 Re: plpgsql, return can contains any expression