Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++

From: Ogden <lists(at)darkstatic(dot)com>
To: ktm(at)rice(dot)edu
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++
Date: 2011-08-17 18:32:41
Message-ID: E6229A9F-876F-4604-900A-EC93C5B720AB@darkstatic.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Aug 17, 2011, at 1:31 PM, ktm(at)rice(dot)edu wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:26:56PM -0500, Ogden wrote:
>> I am using bonnie++ to benchmark our current Postgres system (on RAID 5) with the new one we have, which I have configured with RAID 10. The drives are the same (SAS 15K). I tried the new system with ext3 and then XFS but the results seem really outrageous as compared to the current system, or am I reading things wrong?
>>
>> The benchmark results are here:
>>
>> http://malekkoheavyindustry.com/benchmark.html
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Ogden
>
> That looks pretty normal to me.
>
> Ken

But such a jump from the current db01 system to this? Over 20 times difference from the current system to the new one with XFS. Is that much of a jump normal?

Ogden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gary Doades 2011-08-17 18:33:13 Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++
Previous Message ktm@rice.edu 2011-08-17 18:31:01 Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++