Re: ODBC changes

From: "Henshall, Stuart - Design & Print" <SHenshall(at)westcountry-design-print(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: 'Dave Page' <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ODBC changes
Date: 2002-11-28 10:41:31
Message-ID: E382B5D8EDE1D6118DBE0008C759BCD6116AF3@WCPEXCHANGE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Dave Page wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp]
>> Sent: 28 November 2002 01:42
>> To: Dave Page
>> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> Subject: Re: ODBC changes
>>
>>
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Hiroshi,
>>>
>>> Couple of questions:
>>>
>>> 1) Now seems the ideal time for 07.03.0001. Do you agree?
>>
>> I don't object to it.
>>
>>> 2) Is the ODBC3 driver ready to become the main one yet?
>>> I've not seen many bug reports
>>
>> I'm not sure how many people are using the ODBC3 driver.
>
> No, neither do I - it seems unlikely that we'll ever find out though
> unless we take the plunge.
>
> We know that 07.02.0004 is pretty good, so what about dropping the 2,5
> version now, and if people have major problems then they can revert to
> that version until the ODBC3 one is fixed. Otherwise, we'll never
> know if it's ready.
>
> How does that sound?
>
>>
>>> - or for the Unicode one for that matter.
>>
>> I know an application which doesn't work with the Unicode driver.
>
> OK, we can leave that one labelled as Beta.
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
How about leaving out the old one in and call it somethin like Postgresql25
Legacy?
Cheers,
- Stuart

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2002-11-28 12:43:56 Re: ODBC changes
Previous Message Henshall, Stuart - Design & Print 2002-11-28 10:37:57 Re: BUG in Unicode Driver - was: Re: Can't get more than 2