| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | pgsql: Spellcheck: s/descendent/descendant/g |
| Date: | 2016-12-23 16:53:41 |
| Message-ID: | E1cKT6D-0000bT-7R@gemulon.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Spellcheck: s/descendent/descendant/g
I got a little annoyed by reading documentation paragraphs containing
both spellings within a few lines of each other. My dictionary says
"descendant" is the preferred spelling, and it's certainly the majority
usage in our tree, so standardize on that.
For one usage in parallel.sgml, I thought it better to rewrite to avoid
the term altogether.
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/ff33d1456ea098e160cbbc74b332656c06abc2ab
Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/parallel.sgml | 8 ++++----
doc/src/sgml/queries.sgml | 2 +-
doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml | 8 ++++----
src/backend/executor/execParallel.c | 6 +++---
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-23 17:53:44 | pgsql: Doc: improve index entry for "median". |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-12-23 15:56:17 | pgsql: pg_dump: Remove obsolete handling of sequence names |