From: | stefan(at)konink(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | BUG #8130: Hashjoin still gives issues |
Date: | 2013-05-01 12:48:07 |
Message-ID: | E1UXWS7-0007V8-N2@wrigleys.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-performance |
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 8130
Logged by: Stefan de Konink
Email address: stefan(at)konink(dot)de
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.4
Operating system: Linux
Description:
We figured out that two very close query give a massive difference
performance between using select * vs select id.
SELECT *
FROM ambit_privateevent_calendars AS a
,ambit_privateevent AS b
,ambit_calendarsubscription AS c
,ambit_calendar AS d
WHERE c.calendar_id = d.id
AND a.privateevent_id = b.id
AND c.user_id = 1270
AND c.calendar_id = a.calendar_id
AND c.STATUS IN (
1
,8
,2
,15
,18
,4
,12
,20
)
AND NOT b.main_recurrence = true;
With some help on IRC we figured out that "there was a bugfix in hash
estimation recently and I was hoping you were older than that", but since we
are not:
PostgreSQL 9.2.4 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
(Gentoo 4.7.2-r1 p1.6, pie-0.5.5) 4.7.2, 64-bit
...there might still be a bug around.
We compare:
http://explain.depesz.com/s/jRx
http://explain.depesz.com/s/eKE
By setting "set enable_hashjoin = off;" performance in our entire
application increased 30 fold in throughput, which was a bit unexpected but
highly appreciated. The result of the last query:
http://explain.depesz.com/s/AWB
What can we do to provide a bit more of information?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2013-05-01 14:26:53 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #8128: pg_dump (>= 9.1) failed while dumping a scheme named "old" from PostgreSQL 8.4 |
Previous Message | Adrian.Vondendriesch | 2013-05-01 11:59:02 | Re: BUG #8128: pg_dump (>= 9.1) failed while dumping a scheme named "old" from PostgreSQL 8.4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anne Rosset | 2013-05-01 14:05:06 | Deterioration in performance when query executed in multi threads |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-05-01 09:43:36 | Re: In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table |