| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | pgsql: Improve Windows implementation of WaitLatch/WaitLatchOrSocket. |
| Date: | 2012-05-10 17:26:57 |
| Message-ID: | E1SSX8j-0004FC-A2@gemulon.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Improve Windows implementation of WaitLatch/WaitLatchOrSocket.
Ensure that signal handlers are serviced before this function returns.
This should make the behavior more like Unix. Also, add some more
error checking, and make some other cosmetic improvements.
No back-patch since it's not clear whether this is fixing any live bug
that would affect 9.1. I'm more concerned about 9.2 anyway given our
considerable recent expansions in the usage of WaitLatch.
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/8ebc908c575b3378c9d4096412d16d91d107311c
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/port/win32_latch.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-10 17:36:58 | pgsql: Fix Windows implementation of PGSemaphoreLock. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-05-10 17:16:20 | pgsql: New 9.2 SSL parameters are GUC, not libpq, per Magnus's observat |