pgsql: Add comments explaining why our Itanium spinlock implementation

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Add comments explaining why our Itanium spinlock implementation
Date: 2012-03-16 08:22:20
Message-ID: E1S8SQW-00055t-O2@gemulon.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Add comments explaining why our Itanium spinlock implementation is safe.

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/aef5fe7efee5bde4abd618adbaf4c13f44ee59ab

Modified Files
--------------
src/include/storage/s_lock.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-03-16 17:12:39 pgsql: Revisit handling of UNION ALL subqueries with non-Var output col
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-15 20:50:00 pgsql: A couple more fixes for the sepgsql documentation.