pgsql: On further reflection, we'd better do the same in int.c.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: On further reflection, we'd better do the same in int.c.
Date: 2011-03-12 00:04:33
Message-ID: E1PyCJt-00045R-Nw@gemulon.postgresql.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On further reflection, we'd better do the same in int.c.

We previously heard of the same problem in int24div(), so there's not a
good reason to suppose the problem is confined to cases involving int8.

Branch
------
REL9_0_STABLE

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f6b2ab7d95d718f67c0cde8e7638053d40c221e6

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/utils/adt/int.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-03-12 08:13:59 pgsql: Add test case for collation mismatch in recursive query
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-11 23:19:28 pgsql: Put in some more safeguards against executing a division-by-zero