Re: regression failure on latest CVS

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 'pgsql-hackers list' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: regression failure on latest CVS
Date: 2005-07-26 13:52:01
Message-ID: E1DxPqj-00026f-Rm@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul 26 2005, ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip works OK for me without these options,
> > with either integer or float timestamps. I don't see any new warnings,
> > either.
> > It could well be that the recent changes have introduced some
> > portability problem in the interval code, but someone's going to have to
> > actually dig for it :-(
> >
> That's my feeling but I have no clue where to start.
> I know this was introduced at the end of last week.

I'm confident the SCO Compiler guys will get to the bottom of it :)

They've got all the info they need, as far as I know, as well as
access to my box.

LER

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-07-26 14:20:50 Re: Rollback issue with SET ROLE
Previous Message ohp 2005-07-26 13:47:47 Re: regression failure on latest CVS