| From: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order? |
| Date: | 2018-10-30 08:06:27 |
| Message-ID: | E17F03D4-F9BA-489C-BAB7-79DF6D45E04F@yandex-team.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi!
> 2 окт. 2018 г., в 11:37, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> написал(а):
>
> Please note that the latest patch set does not apply, so this has been
> switched to commit fest 2018-11, waiting on author for a rebase.
PFA rebased version. I've added LDFLAGS_INTERNAL += $(ICU_LIBS) in libpq, but I'm not entirely sure this is correct way to deal with complaints on ICU functions from libpq linking.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-ICU-as-a-default-collation-provider-rebased-oct-2018.patch | application/octet-stream | 189.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2018-10-30 08:30:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
| Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2018-10-30 08:04:56 | Re: Installation instructions update (pg_ctl) |