Re: Proposal: Cascade REPLICA IDENTITY changes to leaf partitions

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Cascade REPLICA IDENTITY changes to leaf partitions
Date: 2026-01-27 07:28:40
Message-ID: E1798721-9D88-4AD2-B032-F3CB22621048@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jan 27, 2026, at 14:56, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 04:56:36PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
>> I have verified the problem. The real problem is, after index
>> rebuild, indisreplident flag of index on child partition will be
>> lost, which should be a bug. I will start a new thread to give more
>> details of the problem and propose a fix.
>
> That sounds like a real problem, yes. Thanks for starting a new
> thread about that.
> --
> Michael

This is the new discussion for the bug:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/DB533C25-C6BA-4C0F-8046-96168E9CDD72%40gmail.com

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-01-27 07:26:48 Re: Safer hash table initialization macro