Re: MERGE/SPLIT PARTITIONS issues/questions

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: MERGE/SPLIT PARTITIONS issues/questions
Date: 2026-08-17 10:35:48
Message-ID: E16F1F5C-C81C-40A1-B1D5-7A45A85774CB@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

> On 17 Aug 2026, at 12:31, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> wrote:

> my only question (and I think this was the generic suggestion above) is that we
> should treat every divergence the way 0004 does the RLS policies.

That would be my preference.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message zengman 2026-08-17 14:09:41 Re:BUG #19625: SQL/JSON boolean DEFAULT expression silently replaced with 'false'
Previous Message Zsolt Parragi 2026-08-17 10:31:02 Re: MERGE/SPLIT PARTITIONS issues/questions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zsolt Parragi 2026-08-17 10:36:03 Re: basebackup: do not verify checksums on pages written before enabling checksums
Previous Message Zsolt Parragi 2026-08-17 10:31:02 Re: MERGE/SPLIT PARTITIONS issues/questions