| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO items for window functions |
| Date: | 2009-01-01 11:45:25 |
| Message-ID: | E1654F91-CC01-4F71-82FA-1584876D8096@hi-media.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Happy new year!
Le 31 déc. 08 à 17:04, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> a écrit :
> However, it seems kind of inconsistent to do this for window functions
> unless we also make \df start putting parens around the argument lists
> for regular functions. Comments?
A way to distinguish between window functions "seeing" frames vs.
partitions, if possible, would sound quite useful after a docs reading
session.
AKA OVER(... order by ...) effect in some other thread.
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-01 13:42:42 | Re: TODO items for window functions |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-01 10:00:41 | Re: lazy_truncate_heap() |