Re: Ordered Append Node

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Markus Schiltknecht" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, "Florian Weimer" <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>, "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ordered Append Node
Date: 2007-11-23 13:40:40
Message-ID: E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA579029138F5@m0143.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > But that requires a) dealing with the problem of the parent table
which has no
> > constraints and ...

Imho we should provide a mechanism that forces the parent to be empty
and let the planner know.
e.g. a false constraint on parent ONLY.

Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jens-Wolfhard Schicke 2007-11-23 15:11:47 Re: Ordered Append Node
Previous Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-11-23 13:21:22 Re: High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix