Re: HOT - preliminary results

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HOT - preliminary results
Date: 2007-03-01 15:43:01
Message-ID: E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA57901CB0032@m0143.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > accounts 157895 (initial size) 49284 (increase)
> > accounts_pkey 19709 (initial size) 19705 (increase)
> >
> >
> Just to clarify, the relation size and increase is in number
> of blocks.

The numbers are quite impressive :-) Have you removed the selects on
accounts too ?
Seems that should also show improvements.

Do you prune chains during update also ? This seems important for a
scenario where only few selects but many updates happen.

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2007-03-01 15:45:00 Re: Dead Space Map version 2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-01 15:31:38 Re: CLUSTER, using SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock?