Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum

From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Date: 2023-04-12 12:22:34
Message-ID: E088D96B-7E4B-456E-AFA9-6B4B76620B3E@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This should be OK (also checked the code paths where the reports are
> added). Note that the patch needed a few adjustments for its
> indentation.

Thanks for the formatting corrections! This looks good to me.

--
Sami

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2023-04-12 12:30:03 Re: [PATCH] Use role name "system_user" instead of "user" for unsafe_tests
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-04-12 12:19:51 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners