Re: [PATCH] Use role name "system_user" instead of "user" for unsafe_tests

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use role name "system_user" instead of "user" for unsafe_tests
Date: 2023-04-12 12:30:03
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TOA4tOQn9S-mzc_jeKBgwd7=T-=JxzfzmGXjF3PnyWL2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> Whether we need to have a test for this at all is perhaps a
> more interesting argument.

This was my initial thought but since somebody put it there I assumed
this is a very important test.

Any objections if we remove the tests for "user"?

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-04-12 12:34:46 Re: v12: ERROR: subplan "InitPlan 2 (returns $4)" was not initialized
Previous Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2023-04-12 12:22:34 Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum