| From: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands |
| Date: | 2017-05-10 20:10:48 |
| Message-ID: | E061A8E3-5E3D-494D-94F0-E8A9B312BBFC@amazon.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Hackers,
Currently, VACUUM commands allow you to specify one table or all of the tables in the current database to vacuum. I’ve recently found myself wishing I could specify multiple tables in a single VACUUM statement. For example, this would be convenient when there are several large tables in a database and only a few need cleanup for XID purposes. Is this a feature that the community might be interested in?
I’ve attached my first attempt at introducing this functionality. In the patch, I’ve extended the table_name parameter in the VACUUM grammar to a qualified_name_list. While this fits into the grammar decently well, I suspect that it may be desirable to be able to specify a column list for each table as well (e.g. VACUUM foo (a), bar (b)). The attached patch requires that only one table be specified in order to specify a column list. But before I spend too much more time working on this, I thought I’d see how pgsql-hackers@ felt about this feature.
Thanks,
Nathan Bossart
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| vacuum_multiple_tables_v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 16.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2017-05-10 20:17:29 | Re: Function to move the position of a replication slot |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-05-10 20:09:38 | Transaction held open by autoanalyze can be a bottleneck |