From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands |
Date: | 2017-05-10 21:02:07 |
Message-ID: | 20170510210207.GC12623@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:10:48PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> Currently, VACUUM commands allow you to specify one table or all of
> the tables in the current database to vacuum. I’ve recently found
> myself wishing I could specify multiple tables in a single VACUUM
> statement. For example, this would be convenient when there are
> several large tables in a database and only a few need cleanup for
> XID purposes. Is this a feature that the community might be
> interested in?
I haven't read the implementation yet, but I've wanted this feature
several times.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-10 21:35:21 | Re: Bug in pg_dump --table and --exclude-table for declarative partition table handling. |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-05-10 20:59:51 | Re: Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() |