RE: Running rsync backups in pg15

From: Murthy Nunna <mnunna(at)fnal(dot)gov>
To: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Running rsync backups in pg15
Date: 2024-11-08 15:07:41
Message-ID: DM8PR09MB6677F19E2DDD6E18A4FDE2D6B85D2@DM8PR09MB6677.namprd09.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Yes. We already have streaming replication. But we still rely on rsync backups for PITR. We keep two copies of rsync backups. The oldest full rsync is 7 days. We save all WALs for 8 days. We do not want to change this scheme. There are some bells and whistles during rsync to monitor the backup. With the introduction of new requirement ( need to run pg_backup_start/stop in same connection) we end up rewriting our backup scripts.

As noted earlier, I did a crash test in pg14 (which uses old functions pg_start_backup/stop in separate connections) but I did not encounter any issue like lingering backup_label file that prevents cluster restart etc. What I noticed is pg14 is nicely renaming the backup_label file before restarting the cluster.

Please (pretty please) somebody tell me (via a URL that explains is good enough) what problem is solved by introducing the new restriction of having to run pg_backup_start/stop in same connection. I am pretty sure I am missing the point… May be I should run the crash test in a different way to reproduce the issue.

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2024 8:09 AM
To: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Running rsync backups in pg15

That looks a whole lot like the results you get from async Streaming Replication.

Which is, of course, a DR solution, NOT a backup solution.

--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2024-11-08 15:32:34 Re: Running rsync backups in pg15
Previous Message Achilleas Mantzios - cloud 2024-11-08 15:04:07 Re: Hi Corruption in Postgres