RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply

From: "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date: 2023-01-09 09:32:01
Message-ID: DM4PR84MB173460530245F56364E1DAF7EEFE9@DM4PR84MB1734.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, Thanks for the great new feature.

Applied patches include adding wait events LogicalParallelApplyMain, LogicalParallelApplyStateChange.
However, it seems that monitoring.sgml only contains descriptions for pg_locks. The attached patch adds relevant wait event information.
Please update if you have a better description.

Noriyoshi Shinoda
-----Original Message-----
From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 5:51 PM
To: houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>; wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com; Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>; shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com; PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply

On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 11:32 AM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, January 8, 2023 11:59 AM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > Attach the updated patch set.
>
> Sorry, the commit message of 0001 was accidentally deleted, just
> attach the same patch set again with commit message.
>

Pushed the first (0001) patch.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment Content-Type Size
monitoring_wait_event_v1.diff application/octet-stream 967 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2023-01-09 09:56:12 Re: POC: Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete()
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-01-09 09:23:32 Re: Privileges on PUBLICATION