Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases

From: Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464(at)outlook(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
Date: 2016-09-30 18:12:34
Message-ID: DM2PR05MB622F31F79BED2850F9C16618CC10@DM2PR05MB622.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>Then you need different clusters per tenant. Otherwise, the WAL records
> of different tenants are inextricably mingled together.

Yes we are aware of it .This part is OK as it is not deemed as user table data.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Clarke 2016-09-30 18:32:02 Re: [ANNOUNCE] pgAdmin 4 v1.0 Released!
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-09-30 17:58:32 Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases