Re: Grab bag of smaller OpenSSL fixups

On Tue Jul 14, 2026 at 7:49 AM UTC, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 13 Jul 2026, at 22:38, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io> wrote:
>> I did have one comment in patch 0001. For the
>> hasWarned argument to init_host_context, do we you think we should add
>> an Assert(hasWarned) or add a pg_attribute_nonnull(3)? I see we
>> dereference the pointer without first checking for its validity. I know
>> it isn't common in Postgres source code to add such protections, but
>> I figured I would point it out anyway.
>
> Given that this is a very niche static function with very few callsites, I'm
> not too worried about it being called with NULL. That being said, defensive
> programming isn't just to defend against what we know but also what we don't
> know about so I'm not against adding such protections. There are likely many
> other functions in this file which could benefit more from pg_attribute_nonnull
> but we also need to start somewhere.

Indeed. There are places all over the codebase that would likely benefit
from pg_attribute_nonnull. Choosing when to add the annotation takes
a bit of thought.

--
Tristan Partin
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
AWS (https://aws.amazon.com)