Re: libpq maligning postgres stability

From: "Jelte Fennema-Nio" <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: libpq maligning postgres stability
Date: 2026-06-11 06:46:18
Message-ID: DJ60NPKYB9L9.3I3SS9I2MBL00@jeltef.nl
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue Jun 9, 2026 at 11:44 PM CEST, Andres Freund wrote:
> Note that the tests don't pass with this applied:
>
> https://github.com/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/actions/runs/27235961657

Hmmm, I'm pretty sure I ran the tests locally before submitting the
patch. Maybe I only ran the regress suite...

Attached is a new version of the patch that includes fixes for the test
failures. This also required a small change to postgres_fdw (see commit
message for details).

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-libpq-Consider-a-connection-with-a-FATAL-error-to.patch text/x-patch 26.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2026-06-11 06:47:17 Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2026-06-11 06:44:07 Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st