Re: PG19beta1: GCC 16.1.1 warning: ‘actual_arg_types’ may be used uninitialized in clauses.c

From: "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>
To: "Nathan Bossart" <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hans Buschmann" <buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net>
Subject: Re: PG19beta1: GCC 16.1.1 warning: ‘actual_arg_types’ may be used uninitialized in clauses.c
Date: 2026-06-04 22:24:51
Message-ID: DJ0M8IHRSUPA.S0XOGR9WZVJI@partin.io
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu Jun 4, 2026 at 3:08 PM UTC, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 02:42:18PM +0000, Hans Buschmann wrote:
>> 839/2360] Compiling C object src/backend/postgres_lib.a.p/optimizer_util_clauses.c.o
>> ../src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c: In function ‘recheck_cast_function_args.isra’:
>> ../src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c:5152:19: warning: ‘actual_arg_types’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>> 5152 | rettype = enforce_generic_type_consistency(actual_arg_types,
>
> This code is ~18 years old, so I'm dubious there's a real problem here.

Pulling the code into the email:

> static void
> recheck_cast_function_args(List *args, Oid result_type,
> Oid *proargtypes, int pronargs,
> HeapTuple func_tuple)
> {
> [...]
> Oid actual_arg_types[FUNC_MAX_ARGS];
> [...]
> ListCell *lc;
>
> if (list_length(args) > FUNC_MAX_ARGS)
> elog(ERROR, "too many function arguments");
> nargs = 0;
> foreach(lc, args)
> {
> actual_arg_types[nargs++] = exprType((Node *) lfirst(lc));
> }
> Assert(nargs == pronargs);
> memcpy(declared_arg_types, proargtypes, pronargs * sizeof(Oid));
> rettype = enforce_generic_type_consistency(actual_arg_types,

GCC seems right to complain. A NIL list or a list with a length of 0
would initialize none of the elements in actual_arg_types. However, is
this a problem in actuality? No, because we use nargs to make sure we
don't access uninitialized memory in
enforce_generic_type_consistency(). Maybe GCC's static analysis is a lot
smarter than I give it credit for though, and this is a compiler bug in
the newer version.

> Does something like this suppress the warning?
>
> Oid actual_arg_types[FUNC_MAX_ARGS] = {InvalidOid};

I could not reproduce on 16.1.0 via nixpkgs or 16.1.1 on Fedora 44
(which is strange), but theoretically this would work.

--
Tristan Partin
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
AWS (https://aws.amazon.com)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maxime Schoemans 2026-06-04 22:31:07 Re: Multi-Entry Indexing for GiST & SP-GiST
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-06-04 22:21:07 Re: Fix OAuth validator docs for error_detail on internal errors