| From: | "Jelte Fennema-Nio" <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tomas Vondra" <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bump soft open file limit (RLIMIT_NOFILE) to hard limit on startup |
| Date: | 2026-03-14 14:16:56 |
| Message-ID: | DH2KI9CKKNA8.RW1T8VO8PKXB@jeltef.nl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun Dec 7, 2025 at 4:55 PM CET, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> I needed to rebase this patch, and that made me finally take the time to
> do the restoration of the file limit for subprocesses properly:
Rebased version attached.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v10-0001-Bump-postmaster-soft-open-file-limit-RLIMIT_NOFI.patch | text/x-patch | 22.0 KB |
| v10-0002-Reflect-the-value-of-max_safe_fds-in-max_files_p.patch | text/x-patch | 1.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2026-03-14 14:53:21 | Re: Tighten asserts on ParallelWorkerNumber a little bit |
| Previous Message | Henson Choi | 2026-03-14 14:14:26 | Re: Row pattern recognition |