| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Tighten asserts on ParallelWorkerNumber a little bit |
| Date: | 2026-03-14 14:53:21 |
| Message-ID: | 77609a7a-4d7f-4c24-890a-5af9ebcfe9bd@vondra.me |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/13/26 11:53, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> ...
>
>> So AFAICS the assert(s) should be
>>
>> Assert(ParallelWorkerNumber < node->shared_info->num_workers);
>
> I think that you're right. It looks like the first one has been introduced
> by bf11e7ee2e3 and then the others are probably copy/paste.
>
>> I don't think we had issues with this not catching a bug. But it may be
>> a bit misleading, so worth fixing and (probably) backpatching.
>
> I do agree.
>
> With that patch applied, the remaining one:
>
> $ git grep "<=.*num_workers"
> src/backend/executor/nodeGatherMerge.c: Assert(nreaders <= castNode(GatherMerge, gm_state->ps.plan)->num_workers);
>
> does not need to be fixed, so I think that your patch does not miss any and
> LGTM.
>
Thanks. Pushed and backpatched.
--
Tomas Vondra
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-03-14 15:06:04 | Re: pg_plan_advice |
| Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2026-03-14 14:16:56 | Re: Bump soft open file limit (RLIMIT_NOFILE) to hard limit on startup |