| From: | "Jelte Fennema-Nio" <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bertrand Drouvot" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Thomas Munro" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Safer hash table initialization macro |
| Date: | 2026-01-26 10:05:49 |
| Message-ID: | DFYFQDUFZ38Q.1LEJWN1P20X8Q@jeltef.nl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon Jan 26, 2026 at 9:41 AM CET, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 12:38:15AM +0100, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>> On Wed Jan 14, 2026 at 9:46 AM CET, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>> > Changed wording and changed to NOTE.
>>
>> Attached is v7 which is rebased and changed the hash_create calls
>> introduced by 282b1cde9de.
>
> Thanks!
>
> The changes make sense to me.
>
> Just a pgindent nit, in 0003:
Fixed
> Also, I can see (I think it's coming from 0004):
Are you sure you applied the latest one, I had seen that in CI and fixed
it in v7. Should definitely be fixed now at least.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v8-0001-Add-hash_make-macros.patch | text/x-patch | 15.2 KB |
| v8-0002-Add-foreach_hash-macro.patch | text/x-patch | 3.9 KB |
| v8-0003-Use-hash_make-macros-throughout-the-codebase.patch | text/x-patch | 97.4 KB |
| v8-0004-Use-foreach_hash-macro-throughout-the-codebase.patch | text/x-patch | 71.9 KB |
| v8-0005-Inline-functions-that-have-now-become-trivial.patch | text/x-patch | 5.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2026-01-26 10:13:57 | meson: Make test output much more useful on failure (both in CI and locally) |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-01-26 09:52:58 | Re: Is abort() still needed in WalSndShutdown()? |