| From: | "Matheus Alcantara" <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Pierre Ducroquet" <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] llvmjit: always add the simplifycfg pass |
| Date: | 2026-01-22 19:54:17 |
| Message-ID: | DFVDQRXJX7QW.KLYVOJSQW08Y@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 07/01/26 12:08, Pierre Ducroquet wrote:
> Hi
>
> While reading the code generated by llvmjit, I realized the number of LLVM basic blocks used in tuple deforming was directly visible in the generated assembly code with the following code:
> 0x723382b781c1: jmp 0x723382b781c3
> 0x723382b781c3: jmp 0x723382b781eb
> 0x723382b781c5: mov -0x20(%rsp),%rax
> 0x723382b781..: ... .....
> 0x723382b781e7: mov %cx,(%rax)
> 0x723382b781ea: ret
> 0x723382b781eb: jmp 0x723382b781ed
> 0x723382b781ed: jmp 0x723382b781ef
> 0x723382b781ef: jmp 0x723382b781f1
> 0x723382b781f1: jmp 0x723382b781f3
> 0x723382b781f3: mov -0x30(%rsp),%rax
> 0x723382b781..: ... ......
> 0x723382b78208: mov %rcx,(%rax)
> 0x723382b7820b: jmp 0x723382b781c5
> That's a lot of useless jumps, and LLVM has a specific pass to get rid of these. The attached patch modifies the llvmjit code to always call this pass, even below jit_optimize_above_cost.
>
> On a basic benchmark (a simple select * from table where f = 42), this optimization saved 7ms of runtime while using only 0.1 ms of extra optimization time.
>
The patch needs a rebase due to e5d99b4d9ef.
You've added the "simplifycfg" only when the "jit_optimize_above_cost"
is not triggered which will use the default<O0> and mem2reg passes, the
default<O3> pass already include "simplifycfg"?
With e5d99b4d9ef being committed, should we add "simplifycfg" when
PGJIT_INLINE bit is set since it also use the default<O0> and mem2reg
passes?
--
Matheus Alcantara
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2026-01-22 19:59:21 | Re: Race conditions in logical decoding |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2026-01-22 19:50:22 | Re: Race conditions in logical decoding |