| From: | "Jelte Fennema-Nio" <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andreas Karlsson" <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Babak Ghadiri" <bbkghadiri6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallelizing startup with many databases |
| Date: | 2026-01-04 10:15:41 |
| Message-ID: | DFFQ5YDV4NCK.G9OHPG52QKL2@jeltef.nl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Sun Jan 4, 2026 at 1:02 AM CET, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> writes:
>> On 1/4/26 12:26 AM, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>>> <Moving this discussion to pgsql-docs, with accompanying patch>
>
>> If we move the GUC in the documentation shouldn't we also move it in
>> postgresql.conf.sample? The sections in the documentation and the
>> sections in the sample config file seem to be the same.
>
> You would also need to change the group that the GUC is assigned to
> in guc_parameters.dat. So this isn't really a docs-only patch.
> (I agree that the GUC seems misclassified as-is.)
Good points. Attached an updated patch that changes
postgresql.conf.sample and the group too.
I didn't move the thread back to pgsql-hackers though, since changing
the location once more seemed counterproductive. Especially since it's
still a docs change at heart.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Move-recovery_init_sync_method-GUC-to-WAL_RECOVER.patch | text/x-patch | 8.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2026-01-06 04:11:20 | Doubt on content under Routine Vacuuming section |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2026-01-04 08:16:26 | Re: doc: Fix sentences with missing period |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2026-01-04 11:21:24 | Re: Optimize JsonbContainerTypeName by reordering type checks |
| Previous Message | Andrey Borodin | 2026-01-04 09:46:06 | Re: WIP - xmlvalidate implementation from TODO list |