Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.

From: "Zidenberg, Tsahi" <tsahee(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Date: 2020-12-01 21:43:53
Message-ID: DE8D4E85-75B4-4888-9B19-5D1D6E37FD33@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 01/12/2020, 19:08, "Alexander Korotkov" <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> BTW, what number of clients did you use? I can't find it in your message.

Sure. Important params seem to be:

Pgbench:
Clients: 256
pgbench_jobs : 32
Scale: 1000
fill_factor: 90

Postgresql:
shared buffers: 31GB
max_connections: 1024

Thanks!
Tsahi.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-12-01 22:18:36 Re: Deleting older versions in unique indexes to avoid page splits
Previous Message Patrick Handja 2020-12-01 21:42:56 Re: Setof RangeType returns