|From:||Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>|
|To:||Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>|
|Cc:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Dunstan <tom(at)tomd(dot)cc>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io|
|Subject:||Re: Allow auto_explain to log to NOTICE|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
> On 5 Jan 2019, at 01:04, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:45:55PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> (Michael: sorry for not having responded to your comments on the patch, $life
>> has had little time over for hacking lately)
> No worries, I understand.
>> There is that. We might not be excited about writing tests for this
>> contrib module but someone else might want to use this for testing
>> their application in a similar manner to how pg_regress tests?
> If we don't introduce it, there is no way to know. Still if somebody
> needs to create regression tests they could just use EXPLAIN for the
> same purpose. However, the option still seems useful to me to get out
> plans with the most generic output, so I support the idea. If others
> don't feel so, I am fine to give up as well.
This didn’t attract any other interested parties, and I don’t feel the added
complexity is worth a continued discussion, so I’m closing this patch. Thanks
for the review.
|Next Message||Andres Freund||2019-01-31 13:56:08||Re: Add client connection check during the execution of the query|
|Previous Message||Pavel Stehule||2019-01-31 13:54:49||Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions (PostgreSQL 11)|