Re: parallelize queries containing initplans

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallelize queries containing initplans
Date: 2017-10-01 23:39:02
Message-ID: DE4F14C5-5A86-421A-92CB-12D896D46E76@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 15 Sep 2017, at 04:45, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Haribabu Kommi
>>> <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for adding more details. It is easy to understand.
>>>>
>>>> I marked the patch as ready for committer in the commitfest.
>>
>> Rebased the patch. The output of test case added by the patch is also
>> slightly changed because of the recent commit
>> 7df2c1f8daeb361133ac8bdeaf59ceb0484e315a. I have verified that the
>> new test result is as expected.
>
> The latest patch again needs to be rebased. Find rebased patch
> attached with this email.

Moved to next commitfest, but changed to Waiting for author since it no longer
applies cleanly.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2017-10-01 23:55:19 Re: issue: record or row variable cannot be part of multiple-item INTO list
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2017-10-01 23:36:17 Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem