Re: Adding clarification on extension_control_path when extension is present in multiple folders

From: "Matheus Alcantara" <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Pierrick" <pierrick(dot)chovelon(at)dalibo(dot)com>, <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding clarification on extension_control_path when extension is present in multiple folders
Date: 2025-09-10 12:39:09
Message-ID: DCP4KLQCQDCG.2QKVXFFWBX2UF@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri Sep 5, 2025 at 10:53 AM -03, Pierrick wrote:
> When playing with the new GUC extension_control_path, I found that the
> paths are evaluated one by one
> (like search_path)and if an extension is present in multiple paths, only
> the on in the first path
> will be considered.I think this is totally fine, but I'd like to adda
> documentation patch to explain
> this (attached file).
>
> What do you think ?
>

Hi, thanks for working on this!

Just to mention that I have this on my plate, I'm just waiting for a
conclusion on discussion at [1] so that I can make a proper review here.

Thanks!

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8f5a0517-1cb8-4085-ae89-77e7454e27ba@dalibo.com

--
Matheus Alcantara

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2025-09-12 22:51:13 ANALYZE being a read v write operation clarification
Previous Message Oleg 2025-09-10 07:54:11 Documentation improvement patch