RE: CRC32C Parallel Computation Optimization on ARM

From: Xiang Gao <Xiang(dot)Gao(at)arm(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: CRC32C Parallel Computation Optimization on ARM
Date: 2023-10-26 08:53:31
Message-ID: DB9PR08MB6991506A18EE4C99D8197653F5DDA@DB9PR08MB6991.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 24 Oct, 2023 20:45:39PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>I tried this. pg_waldump on 2 million ~8kB records took around 8.1 seconds
>without the patch and around 7.4 seconds with it (an 8% improvement).
>pg_waldump on 1 million ~16kB records took around 3.2 seconds without the
>patch and around 2.4 seconds with it (a 25% improvement).

Could you please provide details on how to generate these 8kB size or 16kB size data? Thanks!

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-10-26 09:06:44 Re: CRC32C Parallel Computation Optimization on ARM
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2023-10-26 08:49:02 Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements