Re: "openssl" should not be optional

> On 24 Sep 2025, at 13:51, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:

>> Do you feel like expanding your patch or should I?
>
> TBH I know very little about how TAP interfaces with the build system,
> so that's better with you.

Looking at this I was reminded that we already handle this by using a fallback
and the test worked all along. The message for this was quite poorly worded
though, and used a warning instead of a note. The attached will try to detect
openssl being missing before trying to run it, and will skip the warning
message if the fallback is used (which really isn't a warning in the first
place).

The ERROR in 003_sslinfo is intentional, we are testing that processing fails
by passing an invalid value.

--
Daniel Gustafsson