| From: | Niels Kristian Schjødt <nielskristian(at)autouncle(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua D(dot) Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vasilis Ventirozos <v(dot)ventirozos(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Setup of four 15k SAS disk with LSI raid controller |
| Date: | 2013-03-13 19:26:46 |
| Message-ID: | DB59909E-3303-4D74-8DE4-C8DB3A4D028F@autouncle.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Den 13/03/2013 kl. 20.01 skrev Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
>
> On 03/13/2013 11:45 AM, Vasilis Ventirozos wrote:
>> Its better to split WAL segments and data just because these two have
>> different io requirements and because its easier to measure and tune
>> things if you have them on different disks.
>
> Generally speaking you are correct but we are talking about RAID 0 here.
So your suggestion is?
> JD
>
> --
> Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
> High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
> @cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl Denninger | 2013-03-13 19:38:27 | Re: New server setup |
| Previous Message | Steve Crawford | 2013-03-13 19:23:18 | Re: New server setup |