From: | "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Date: | 2006-08-22 13:51:10 |
Message-ID: | DB106B1B5B8F734B8FF3E155A3A556C202D4FE4E@clemail1.tmwsystems.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> > RT is easy to setup/configure/use and works well with PostgreSQL as
> > the backend.
>
> RT works with Postgres, but I wouldn't say well. All queries
> in RT are generated by a query generator due to a naive
> obsession with database independance. They've achieved
> database independance at the cost of all the queries being
> brain-dead. Fixing the query generator would be a pretty big job.
>
We use RT with PostgreSQL for all internal IT requests and
development/support/doc tasks on a couple products, and there's never
been a problem. Are the queries optimal? no. The alternative might have
been MySQL-only, and that would be worse.
I can't really give a fair estimate on performance, because I'm running
it on a PIII at 800MHz with several other things as well. But it's fast
enough that I'm not screaming for a hardware upgrade.
Regards,
Paul Bort
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-22 13:55:59 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY view |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-22 13:48:55 | Re: ISBN/ISSN/ISMN/EAN13 module |