Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation

From: "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation
Date: 2006-07-25 12:38:21
Message-ID: DB106B1B5B8F734B8FF3E155A3A556C202D4FD67@clemail1.tmwsystems.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> psql could actually tell these apart if it worked just a bit harder.
> CLUSTER with no arguments is the one case, CLUSTER with
> anything after it is the other. Not sure why we couldn't be
> bothered to get that right in psql the first time :-(.
>

Should this go on the to-do list?

Regards,
Paul Bort

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-25 12:44:11 Re: 64-bit integers for GUC
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-07-25 12:38:16 Re: 64-bit integers for GUC