Re: plpgsql by default

From: "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql by default
Date: 2006-04-12 14:45:29
Message-ID: DB106B1B5B8F734B8FF3E155A3A556C202D4F948@clemail1.tmwsystems.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I wonder if Oracle ever recommended disabling PL/SQL (not to
> mention MS Transact-SQL)...
>

Don't know abiout Oracle, but you can't disable Transact-SQL in SQL
Server 7.0 or 2000 (don't know about 2003^h5) because Enterprise Manager
and sp_help* require it.

And +1 for not installing plpgsql by default. I just had to CREATELANG
on 20-odd servers scattered across the US, and it was no big thing. Just
rolled it out with the upgrade that needed it.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-04-12 14:53:20 Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2006-04-12 14:32:33 Re: [HACKERS] RH9 postgresql 8.0.7 rpm