Re: Add Index-level REINDEX with multiple jobs

From: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add Index-level REINDEX with multiple jobs
Date: 2024-03-04 06:26:21
Message-ID: DAC8A080-2C7C-4969-9BEF-CEAA385D5AFC@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> On 6 Feb 2024, at 11:21, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> The problem may be actually trickier than that, no? Could there be
> other factors to take into account for their classification, like
> their sizes (typically, we'd want to process the biggest one first, I
> guess)?

Maxim, what do you think about it?

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey M. Borodin 2024-03-04 06:38:01 Re: date_trunc function in interval version
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2024-03-04 06:20:22 Re: a wrong index choose when statistics is out of date