Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
Date: 2010-01-28 00:17:13
Message-ID: DA51FB01-2A4D-4F02-AC39-950909ECE327@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 27, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> Is that not the case with plperlu already?
>
> Sure. Which is why I'm resisting expanding our exposure to it

I don't understand how it's expanding core's exposure to it.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2010-01-28 00:32:58 Re: testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - missing file
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-01-28 00:16:10 Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]