From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Cc: | "peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org" <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Readd use of TAP subtests |
Date: | 2022-04-19 19:14:46 |
Message-ID: | D9FD2300-1FA4-4024-98C7-5D96CCDA4026@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 19 Apr 2022, at 21:07, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 17:02 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Perhaps in another 7 years or so this will be resolved and we can make
>> another attempt at this. ;-)
>
> For what it's worth, the TAP 14 spec was officially released today:
Interesting. I hadn't even registered that a v14 was in the works, and come to
think of it I'm not sure I've yet seen a v13 consumer or producer. For the TAP
support in pg_regress I've kept to the original spec.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-04-19 19:16:05 | Re: error handling in pqRowProcessor broken |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-04-19 19:12:52 | Re: Extract epoch from Interval weird behavior |