| From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Shigeru Hanada *EXTERN*" <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Kohei KaiGai" <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "Etsuro Fujita" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
| Date: | 2012-02-16 15:15:55 |
| Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2077EC242@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Attached patches are revised version, though
> only fdw_helper_v5.patch is unchanged.
Two questions:
- Is it on purpose that you can specify all SSL client options
except "sslcompression"?
- Since a rescan is done by rewinding the cursor, is it necessary
to have any other remote isolation level than READ COMMITED?
There is only one query issued per transaction.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2012-02-16 15:17:25 | Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-02-16 14:09:03 | Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport? |