Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport?
Date: 2012-02-16 14:09:03
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobky7nzQf8+Gu2kpY5ZD-MqAObiuy8j+19wHe+NHZmRgw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> Ah, yes, I think my optimizations were off when building, or
> something.  I didn't get such verbosity at first, and then I remember
> doing something slightly different and then getting a lot of output.
> I didn't pay attention to the build size.  I will investigate.
[...]
>
> I agree, I was about to say "what about a preprocessor hack..." after
> the last paragraph, but saw you beat me to the punch.  I'll have a look soon.

Ping!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2012-02-16 15:15:55 Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-02-16 13:58:35 Re: run GUC check hooks on RESET